Pez-Man: That picture came from E3, I didn't make it. You should have looked at the properties, you'll see it's linked from GamerWeb.
Re FF: http://www.gamepartisan.com/nintendo/ne ... p?view=156
Pumbo: Uh... The only MegaMan game for the NextGen systems is on the PS2?
For starters, MMBN 1 2 and 3 are all on GBA. As is MegaMan Zero. That's 4 MegaMan games on a NextGen system that's _not_ PS2. And, in case you didn't know, Capcom developed both the Zelda Oracle games, and they're also developing the port of Link to the Past. I dunno if they are working on anything Zelda for the GCN, though.
Console Wars
~Twilkitri~
http://darktwilkitri.thegreatbeyond.net/ (is broken)
http://darktwilkitri.thegreatbeyond.net/ (is broken)
And there's one on the GBA with all the GBO games as well!
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
~Twilkitri~
http://darktwilkitri.thegreatbeyond.net/ (is broken)
http://darktwilkitri.thegreatbeyond.net/ (is broken)
What is the difference between the special features? It's rather annoying when different consoles get different features for the same game, like Soul Calibur 2. To get the full experience of playing the game, you'd have to buy it for all three consoles. And on another note, what's with Nintendo and their linking obsession. Every new games requires you to have a Game Boy and a link just to get half the story. I have a Game Boy and a link, but it's still rather annoying. Not to mention Crystal Chronicles, which you NEED 4 Game Boys and 4 links to play with friends. That's really unfair to those who don't have a Game Boy, because then they can't even play. I think Nintendo is being a little overboard on the "connectivity" issues and just trying to get as much cash as they can out of as little work as they can.
What is GBO, DT?
What is GBO, DT?
if the companies that made the consoles weren't so anal about leaking their SDK, detailed specs and hardware info, that would probably be possible, aya. it would, however, come in the form of a PC. *pokes emulators* look! a semi-working ps2 emulator! r0x! ....i have a SNES emulator for PS2....*is weird* nothin' like playing good old mario on a PS2! er......
?Pez-Man wrote:And on another note, what's with Nintendo and their linking obsession. Every new games requires you to have a Game Boy and a link just to get half the story.
Such as?
No... you need a minimum of _2_ GameBoys and link cables to play with friends/relatives. Who's likely to have 3 people over at their house at once?Not to mention Crystal Chronicles, which you NEED 4 Game Boys and 4 links to play with friends.
Buh? It takes less work to program things to connect to each other than it takes to not?That's really unfair to those who don't have a Game Boy, because then they can't even play. I think Nintendo is being a little overboard on the "connectivity" issues and just trying to get as much cash as they can out of as little work as they can.
It's just a one-time purchase, Pez... if you had to buy a new GB&Link with every game, then it'd be different.
Game Boy Original, of course. What else would it beWhat is GBO, DT?
~Twilkitri~
http://darktwilkitri.thegreatbeyond.net/ (is broken)
http://darktwilkitri.thegreatbeyond.net/ (is broken)
Crystal Chronicles, of course, is the best example. Wind Waker had a special section just for the Game Boy. Animal Crossing required the Game Boy to get to a different island. That's all I can think off the top of my head. The game has been called only truly fun when you have four people playing it. I happen to have three other candidates that I would like to play Crystal Chronicles with, but two of them lack a Game Boy. You're probably right about the unfair thing, but it's still a bother. And I usually call the Game Boy GB, not GBO, so I haven't heard of that acronym.
