Page 1 of 1

Timeline

Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2003 2:13 pm
by chromus
After a 3-week hiatus from movies, I sure picked the wrong movie to start back up with.

"Time travel becomes possible in the near future. A Yale history professor (Billy Connolly) travels back to France in 1357, but is unable to return. Three of his students decide to rescue him, but once there, all of them become embroiled in the dangerous action, politics and maladies of the era." (Fandango.com)

The story itself was quite good, and some of the characters played their parts quite well. The problem lies in the main characters and how artificial they act. David Thewlis, playing Robert Doniger, has no reason to act in the insane manner he does. Paul Walker also doesn't show much emotion at all during the movie, despite being the central character. Despite all of the flaws, the movie is actually good and worth watching, perhaps on DVD instead of in the theater.

Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2003 4:32 pm
by beyonder
they should have made it year 1337.

Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2003 7:52 am
by ayana
That's not lame at all...

Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2003 10:15 am
by Figaro
I have the book! >>..... Did I read it?






NO! ^_^

Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2003 6:30 pm
by Zornak
is that a rhotorical question?
...or is the word hypothetical?

i know it's one of them

Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2003 9:18 pm
by Pez-Man
I heard that the movie was better then the book.

Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2003 7:48 am
by ayana
That's rare.

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2003 6:38 pm
by Figaro
It's the case with a couple of Chrichton's novels.


Sphere, for example.

Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2003 7:25 pm
by ayana
*blinks* ... Yes.

Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2003 1:52 pm
by Figaro
*eyes close and open again rapidly* Affirmative.